|
"Once a policeman never
an honest man."
A few days prior to 10/10/92 the wife Sandra and I both made long statements
to Senior Sergeant Neville Haggart about how Donald Britton was terrorizing our family, we wanted the Police to put a stop
to his criminal campaign and revoke his firearms licence . So what does this genius do about it?
10/10/92 Neville (the
devil) Haggart wearing a balaclava, with Britton about a 100 meters from our house. He did that when he knew my wife and kids
were at home but he didn't care if anyone was frightened by his criminal behaviour.
1
Here he is again compounding matters. Britton is playing
for time checking his radiator water, in the hope that I would react to Haggart's provocations. Note the tough guy stance.
2
On 14/10/92 I went to see Haggart (at his request, he wanted
"a few lines off me”) to make a statement about what happened on 10/10/92. For over an hour he tried to catch me out
lying by asking me leading questions about what went on that day. (Remember I didn't know it was him that wore the balaclava
at that stage.) During the interview this was said. (All on tape.)
Jack...Have you identified the joker? (The fool
in the balaclava, I'd shown him the photos.)
Haggart...No.
Jack...Isn't it a crime to wear a mask?
Haggart...No.
(To frighten or provoke people it is!)
3
Haggart...Could he be a farmer or anything like that?
Jack...No.
Haggart...If
I call Britton in and we ascertain who this guy was, I don't know how truthful Britton is likely to be.
Haggart is
wondering how truthful Britton is likely to be! At the end of the interview I asked Haggart if he thought I was "bull****ter".
He said, "no".
When I later (21/12/92) found out just how low a (balaclava wearing) snake Haggart really was I complained
to his bosses in Wellington and this is what I got back.
4
Note 5. how Mansell
dodged the core of my complaint.
In the end Haggart made a statement about his criminal antics of 10/10/92 and this
is how the last page went.
(End of page 5) As having investigated this file in respect of Van Der Lubbe's allegation
that ;
5
So here we have Haggart, the liar, making a false statement (written) to Police and in it he has the gall to accuse
me of being untrustworthy twice and that after he admitted to me that I wasn’t a bull****ter. He was right about being
taped. He admitted to Sandra that our statements to him were "accurate, very accurate". This duplicitious mongrel's word is
used by prosecutors to put people in prison. Now there's a scary thought.
only liars fear the tape recorder.
That
little episode taught me to never, ever trust another cop.
Had this comment in the below box.
"comment: ok Im really confused as to why a cop
would stand outside your
house for no reason. Your
story is really confusing im not sure what this
sites even about!"
Well the reason
Haggart gave for "standing outside" our house was, his words, "I wanted to test his reaction"
He did not believe what
my wife and I had told him about Britton even though he admitted to me on tape that he did not think I was a bull****ter.
He
wanted to prove, just like all the other dopey cops that had preceeded him, that I was a liar so that he could dismiss our
complaint. Well he fell flat on his face, made a complete fool of himself in the eyes of his fellow cops and transferred to
Napier shortly after.
This site is entirely devoted to showing to one and all what a ratbag police force NZ really
has.
Some of the chapters are a bit
long so you might want to go directly to shorter but just as juicy pages via the named link below and hopefully you will get
the jist. If you would rather start at the beginning click NEXT below.
18 Assault
NEXT
|
